From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19439 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2002 22:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19430 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2002 22:14:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2002 22:14:09 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA16781; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D6FEE2F.AAF41234@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:22:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Jim Blandy ] Re: RFA: test GDB's ability to kill threaded programs that die messily References: <3D6EBCB4.B97D8DA3@redhat.com> <20020830004234.GA1540@nevyn.them.org> <3D6FB5A2.351A1D90@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01056.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > > Michael Snyder writes: > > > Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:30:44PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > > Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay --- I've committed the portable thread compilation support that > > > > > > this patch depends on. May I commit this test? > > > > > > > > > > The test is fine. But I missed the fix. Has a fix been committed? > > > > > If you wouldn't mind, could you give me a pointer? > > > > > > > > I don't think there is a fix; this test is related to the same PR as my > > > > ugly warning workaround. > > > > > > Yes, there is no fix. > > > > Didn't we decide that if there's an unfixed bug, you file a bug report, > > but you don't check in a test that will fail? > > I've marked up the tests with commented-out setup_kfail forms that > refer to the bug number, and included the bug number in the test > name. I thought that's how we'd decided to handle these. OK, your recollection is echoed by Andrew. I'm happy now. Please check it in. Thanks, Michael