From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] Query Red Boot's i386 CPU id
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6FCE2C.6050607@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020829234544.GB29966@nevyn.them.org>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:31:46PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Comments on how this was implemented, and what, if anything, could be
>> integrated into GDB, welcome.
>
>
>
>> +/* NOTE: cagney/2001-11-17:
>> +
>> + This module uses the [remote protocol] target_query ("qCPUID")
>> + method to extract the i386 CPU information. It then takes that
>> + information and uses it to do a lookup on a local file
>> + ``cpuid-i386''.
>> +
>> + Thanks to a botched initial thread query mechanism, using anything
>> + starting with ``qC'' is dangerous. Since qCPUID does this, it
>> + won't interact well with targets that recognize the exiting ``qC''
>> + query. Sigh.
>> +
>> + One possible alternative to this qCPUID mechanis would be to plant
>> + a CPUID instruction in the target memory, execute it, and then
>> + examine the result. This probably isn't pratical since it depends
>> + in being able to execute code in the target.
>> +
>> + This file adds the command ``info cpu''. Beware of the existing
>> + commands ``{set,show} {processor,architecture}''.
>> +
>> + This file uses a target_post_open_hook() mechanism to hook into the
>> + target open (and report the CPUID on an initial connect). Per the
>> + comment in the file "target.h", what really should be happening is
>> + a core_gdb_open() function should be calling the hook. */
>
>
> That comment is pretty thorough about my concerns :) Gdbserver doesn't
> support qC yet (just realized a moment ago that it probably should).
> But qCPUID really doesn't work with that. I bet there's deployed
> RedBoot stubs that have this problem?
The comment comes from looking at old stub code:
if (b[0] == 'q' && b[1] == 'C')
handle_crc ();
It really depends on how [badly] the stub is written.
RedBoot stubs (from memory) check qCPUID first --- actually they must as
the patch works with RedBoot.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-30 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-28 15:20 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 0:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-29 16:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-29 16:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-30 12:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-30 6:52 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29 17:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-30 13:08 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D6FCE2C.6050607@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox