From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17119 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2002 20:31:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17099 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 20:31:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 20:31:45 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA11541; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D6D332C.943F28F5@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:33:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Interpreters (~final) (fwd) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00951.txt.bz2 Keith Seitz wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I think this is a great feature (required also for Emacs's GUD interface > > to switch to MI instead of using the (deprecated) annotations). However, > > I think it should be documented in the GDB manual (more accurately in > > gdbmi.texinfo). > > I have documentation for all the changes I've made in the interpreter > branch that I've been working on. I have not yet submitted them because I > didn't want to overload maintainers with a zillion patches. > > If it is desired, I can post the documentation patches. This might be a good way for folks to get a handle on the work before reviewing it.