From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18180-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30920 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2002 01:24:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30911 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 01:24:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 01:24:33 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA28973;
	Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3D6C264F.3FDCD67F@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:12:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
CC: tromey@redhat.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: osabi.c correctness patch (Was: new build failure)
References: <87n0r8i35t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<15723.52602.741154.488098@localhost.redhat.com>	<87d6s4hwwy.fsf_-_@fleche.redhat.com>	<877kichw4e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<15723.64906.189232.478903@localhost.redhat.com> <878z2sgcdn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D6C0D42.8030401@ges.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00930.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >>>>>> "Elena" == Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >
> > Elena> I wonder if we should enable ,-Werror by default on certain
> > Elena> platforms.
> >
> > I was under the impression that the maintainers used it regularly.
> > That's why I enabled it in my builds -- to avoid submitting
> > embarrassing patches in the future :-)
> 
> BTW, your warnings had me puzzled.  I'm building on 7.3, and wasn't
> seeing these!  It turns out that I wasn't using the pre-installed
> compiler :-(
> 
> Anyway, yes, maintainers should have -Werror enabled.  Unfortunatly, the
> best laid plans can occasionally fall down during the implementation stage.

I wonder if we could arrange some sort of makefile switch 
that would be on by default, but turned off by the release
process?