From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: tonny.madsen@nettest.com
Subject: Patch that provides true single step for multi-threaded /proc based processes (Tru64 5.1A)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6ADE55.9FD29B65@redhat.com> (raw)
Howdy everybody,
Hello Tony.
First off -- could you please post in plain text next time?
As you may be able to see, some of us use news readers that
don't handle mark-up languages.
Secondly, please excuse the long delay in reply. Your patch looks
OK to me. We will need a change-log entry, and then it can go in.
Thanks,
Michael Snyder
In the company I work for, we use Tru64 5.1A as the main development
and deployment platform. The rather poor support for this platform in
gdb is the cause of problems and we have devoted some resources to find
a solve the most serious og these (as seem by us).Currently we use the
mdebugread patch as weel to handle the special sections in native Tru64
5.1A shared libraties.One problem we have been bitten by a number of
times was the lack of true single step support for multi-threaded
processes. As Tru64 5.1A is /proc based, the functions in question are
proc_run_process and procfs_resume. In these functions single step
support is only implemented for the new /proc API. Please note that we
use multi-CPU machine so we are bitten by this often!The following patch
will add support for the ioctl PIOCTRUN (if defined) in
proc_run_process.Please comment on this if you see anything wrong with
it.I don't know if the patch is general for all /proc based
architectures, but I currently expect so./tonny
-- gdb/procfs.c-orig 2002-02-14
02:57:36.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb/procfs.c 2002-06-26 10:16:34.000000000 +0200@@ -1748,6
+1748,30 @@win = (write (pi->ctl_fd, (char *) &cmd, sizeof
(cmd)) == sizeof (cmd));}#else /* ioctl method */+#ifdef
PIOCTRUN+ /*+ * If we single step AND the PIOCTRUN ioctl is
supported, then use+ * this. This cures the problem when
single stepping a+ * multi-threaded program, when all the
other threads (than the+ * current single stepped one), may
run free while single stepping.+ *+ * Note that only the
PRSTEP flag is of interrest here (PRCFAULT and+ * PRCSIG are
not allowed).+ */+ if (step) {+ /* Structure from proc(4) on
Tru64 5.1A. */+ struct {+ long pr_count; /* number of threads
to run */+ tid_t pr_error_thread; /* set by kernel if error is
detected */+ struct prrun thread_1; /* prrun struct,
containing thread ID of 1st thread to run in thread_1.pr_tid
*/+ } prrun;+ memset(&prrun, 0, sizeof (prrun));+
prrun.pr_count = 1;+ prrun.thread_1.pr_flags = PRSTEP;+
prrun.thread_1.pr_tid = pi->prstatus.pr_tid;+ win = (ioctl
(pi->ctl_fd, PIOCTRUN, &prrun) >= 0);+ } else+#endif{prrun_t
prrun;
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-27 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-26 19:17 Michael Snyder [this message]
2002-09-10 17:19 ` Michael Snyder
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-26 3:09 Tonny Madsen
2002-08-04 16:56 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D6ADE55.9FD29B65@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tonny.madsen@nettest.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox