From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] procfs.c: TARGET_CAN_USE_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINT via target vector
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6AD4E6.E91859DF@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020813213928.ZM6904@localhost.localdomain>
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 5:11pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > > +#ifndef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS
> >
> > I just think the macro should be `largely' renamed:
> > ``PROCFS_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS''.
> >
> > Largely? There are a few exceptions -- i386v-nat.c and mips/tm-embed.h
> > which could be left alone.
>
> For the procfs related uses, I suspect that we can eliminate the use
> of the macro altogether. (I'd prefer to get Michael's opinion though
> before attempting such a change.)
I don't see how you can eliminate the macro.
How will you distinguish which procfs targets can support HW
watchpoints?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-27 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-12 14:38 Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12 17:40 ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-12 18:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-12 19:40 ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-13 14:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 14:39 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-13 17:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-26 18:31 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D6AD4E6.E91859DF@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox