From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3654 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2002 22:57:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3647 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2002 22:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2002 22:57:53 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D651C3E12; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:57:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D6AB26F.10003@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Generic solution for store_struct_address References: <3D644ACA.3626BF8F@redhat.com> <1020826223151.ZM32716@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00872.txt.bz2 > On Aug 21, 7:22pm, Michael Snyder wrote: > > >> Kevin, would you by any chance be in a position to test it on ia64 >> and/or >> rs6000? > > > Sure, I'll give it a spin... Just FYI, given the thread: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00674.html I'm assuming that this patch is dropped. enjoy, Andrew