From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18032-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7216 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2002 22:45:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7209 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 22:45:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 22:45:25 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA24391;
	Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3D66BB04.31240DA8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:15:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor reformatting in infrun.c
References: <20020817001848.GX906@gnat.com> <3D5DB58E.3A856EB3@redhat.com> <20020822234116.GU25997@gnat.com> <3D657A41.EBE52A4B@redhat.com> <20020823162729.GZ25997@gnat.com> <3D667E8E.8616E88F@redhat.com> <20020823220232.GB25997@gnat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00782.txt.bz2

Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
> > > I can commit the following patch. I verified that a later re-indent
> > > does not cause a formatting change in the second argument.
> >
> > Yes,
> 
> I committed this change.
> 
> > and now I can see no reason not to put the arguments back
> > the way they were originally.  Or, say.
> >
> >   stop_bpstat =
> >     bpstat_stop_status (&stop_pc,
> >                         [...]
> 
> Absolutely. But unfortunately this is not the way indent formats it:
> 
> <<
>           stop_bpstat =
>             bpstat_stop_status
>             (&stop_pc,
>              sw_single_step_trap_p
>              || (currently_stepping (ecs)
>                  && prev_pc != stop_pc - DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
>                  && !(step_range_end
>                       && INNER_THAN (read_sp (), (step_sp - 16)))));
> >>
> 
> Should I check-in the indent'ed version anyway? (I would send a separate
> [PATCH] message)

Nah, I guess we've wasted enough cycles worrying about this 
rather trivial change.  ;-)