From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20355 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2002 22:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20347 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 22:06:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 22:06:03 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B953ED5; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D66B1C7.4050805@ges.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 15:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Revised Z packet spec References: <3D669A90.50401@ges.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 > ! [...] To avoid potential problems with duplicate packets, the >> ! operations should be implemented in an idempotent way. Oops, well spotted! Didn't mean to delete that. Just putting it back. enjoy, Andrew