Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
> Michael,
> 
> > Joel, this implementation, with its use of delete_at_next_stop,
> > seems clumsy and, to be frank, scary.  Instead, what if you just
> > made a temporary copy of the tbreak command-list (like you do for
> > GDB/622), then delete the breakpoint, and later execute the commands?
> 
> Thanks for your review. I need a bit of time to delve into this again,
> but I'll be quite busy in the next 2 or 3 weeks. You can consider this
> patch withdrawn in the meantime.

Aww, come on.  ;-)

OK, maybe it's fresher in my mind now than it is in yours.
How about this?