From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32108 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2002 15:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32098 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2002 15:44:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2002 15:44:18 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595173E0B; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:44:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D63B550.4010807@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 08:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Set ADDR References: <3D630A21.5060308@ges.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 PS: If anyone things this is just a PPC bug: (top-gdb) info registers eax 0xbffff864 -1073743772 ecx 0x0 0 ... (top-gdb) set $ecx = 0 (top-gdb) info registers eax 0x0 0 ecx 0x0 0 ... So I guess two things: - GDB's testsuite doesn't cover this - Someone modifying a register or register variable is a pretty rare occurance Perhaphs I should add a sleep(1) to the value write code and see how long it takes someone to notice that ;-) enjoy, Andrew