Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] register_modified_event
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D617604.3000900@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208191515430.9079-100000@valrhona.uglyboxes.com>

> Hi,
> 
> Here's another event fallout from Apple's MI work. This defines a new 
> event (and adds two notifications for it), register_modified_event, which 
> is sent whenever a register is modified (usually by a user in the command 
> line, but could be via MI or varobj, etc).
> 
> As expected, this causes no regressions in the testsuite. I have tests for 
> this, but I can't commit any of them until all my MI stuff is complete, 
> since event notifications in MI are quite new (and still in approval 
> process).
> 
> Keith
> 
> PS. FYI, I would have named it register_changed_event, just like the hook, 
> but there is a name conflict with register_changed in regcache.c.

Keith,

I don't the register_modified (the changelog called it register_update) 
is correct.  Trying to supply a register number, for instance, is just 
misleading.

See:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=469

There is also a number of postings to gdb@ about this (I think it was 
JimI last major posting).

enjoy,
Andrew



> ChangeLog
> 2002-08-18  Keith Seitz  <keiths@redhat.com>
> 
>         * gdb-events.sh: Add selected_frame_level_changed event.
>         * gdb-events.c: Regenerated.
>         * gdb-events.c: Regenerated.
>         * valops.c (value_assign): Add register_update event notification
>         for lval_register and lval_reg_frame_relative.
> 
> Patch
> Index: gdb-events.sh
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdb-events.sh,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -p -r1.13 gdb-events.sh
> *** gdb-events.sh	16 Aug 2002 16:09:07 -0000	1.13
> --- gdb-events.sh	19 Aug 2002 22:11:13 -0000
> *************** f:void:tracepoint_create:int number:numb
> *** 65,70 ****
> --- 65,71 ----
>   f:void:tracepoint_delete:int number:number
>   f:void:tracepoint_modify:int number:number
>   f:void:architecture_changed:void
> + f:void:register_modified:int regno:regno
>   #*:void:annotate_starting_hook:void
>   #*:void:annotate_stopped_hook:void
>   #*:void:annotate_signalled_hook:void
> *************** f:void:architecture_changed:void
> *** 87,93 ****
>   #*:void:readline_begin_hook:char *format, ...:format
>   #*:char *:readline_hook:char *prompt:prompt
>   #*:void:readline_end_hook:void
> - #*:void:register_changed_hook:int regno:regno
>   #*:void:memory_changed_hook:CORE_ADDR addr, int len:addr, len
>   #*:void:context_hook:int num:num
>   #*:int:target_wait_hook:int pid, struct target_waitstatus *status:pid, status
> --- 88,93 ----
> Index: valops.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/valops.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.66
> diff -p -r1.66 valops.c
> *** valops.c	1 Aug 2002 17:18:33 -0000	1.66
> --- valops.c	19 Aug 2002 22:11:41 -0000
> *************** value_assign (struct value *toval, struc
> *** 678,683 ****
> --- 678,686 ----
>   			      VALUE_CONTENTS (fromval), TYPE_LENGTH (type));
>   #endif
>   	}
> + 
> +       register_modified_event (VALUE_REGNO (toval));
> + 
>         /* Assigning to the stack pointer, frame pointer, and other
>            (architecture and calling convention specific) registers may
>            cause the frame cache to be out of date.  We just do this
> *************** value_assign (struct value *toval, struc
> *** 765,770 ****
> --- 768,774 ----
>   
>   	if (register_changed_hook)
>   	  register_changed_hook (-1);
> + 	register_modified_event (regno);
>         }
>         break;
>   
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-19 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-19 15:17 Keith Seitz
2002-08-19 15:49 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-08-20  9:36   ` Keith Seitz
2002-08-20 13:46     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-20 15:36       ` Keith Seitz
2002-08-20 17:23         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-21  8:34           ` Keith Seitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D617604.3000900@ges.redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=keiths@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox