From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2002 21:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11767 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2002 21:39:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2002 21:39:28 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65493DC6; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:39:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D61658B.1020108@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 14:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Mips, return_value_location, small structs References: <3D5438A9.5F0FA8A8@redhat.com> <3D545AB2.4030803@ges.redhat.com> <3D545BC7.B41142D4@redhat.com> <3D547CE2.6070403@ges.redhat.com> <3D5AA9BC.3580169B@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 > I know o32 needs work too, but the two can be treated separately. >> > I do guarantee that this patch does not make o32 any worse. >> > In fact, I have been testing to make sure that none of my patches >> > have made o32 any worse. >> > >> > Can I check this one in for n32, if I promise to work on o32 next? > >> >> Why not just fix this bug for all three ABIs? o32 is just like n32/n64 >> in that it cross-eyes the arguments. > > > Andrew, o32 works as it is. I can't find anything related to this > patch that still needs to be done for o32. Unles you can suggest > something specific, may I check this patch in? FYI, this patch should now be redundant. I rewrote the n32/n64 extract/store return value code. Andrew