From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3676 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2002 20:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3669 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2002 20:08:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2002 20:08:19 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48EE3CFA; Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:08:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D5FFEA6.9000306@ges.redhat.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:08:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove some write_register_bytes occurences from i386-tdep.c References: <200208181718.g7IHIrg6029437@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3D5FDD69.7000102@ges.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 > As for write_register_bytes() can it be avoided? I've just posted ``regcache_cooked_write_with_offset_hack(). But I don't think that hack is right here. Perhaphs a single register read - modify - write function is needed? Hmm, I just hit a need for the same operation while implementing some pseudo registers. Just adding: regcache_raw_read_part(regcache,regnum,offset,length,buf) regcache_raw_write_part(regcache,regnum,offset,length,buf) Andrew