From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-17588-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11169 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2002 00:25:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11162 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 00:25:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 00:25:08 -0000
Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4AB5D3D39; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D59A362.8050609@ges.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:25:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc:alpha] Switch ALPHA, NS32k and VAX to unwind mechanism
References: <3D503D0F.7040506@ges.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2

>> Anyone with an Alpha want to try it (I think we can suck/see the vax and 
>> ns32k ... :-)?
> 
> [...]
> 
>> 2002-08-06  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
>> 	* vax-tdep.c (vax_get_saved_register): Delete function.
>> 	(vax_gdbarch_init): Update.
>> 	* ns32k-tdep.c (ns32k_get_saved_register): Delete function.
>> 	(ns32k_gdbarch_init): Update.
>> 	* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_get_saved_register): Delete function.
>> 	(alpha_gdbarch_init): Update.
> 
> 
> The change in alpha-tdep.c introduces no new regression on alpha-tru64.
> Tested on a Tru64 5.1A alpha machine.
> 
> Just for the records, here are the results that I get with GNAT as the
> compiler:
> 
>     # of expected passes            7246
>     # of unexpected failures        680
>     # of unexpected successes       5
>     # of expected failures          149
>     # of unresolved testcases       59
>     # of untested testcases         3
>     # of unsupported tests          2

Thanks! I've committed it.

Andrew