From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3653 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2002 21:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3646 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 21:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 21:11:31 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ADF3D39; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:11:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D5975FF.3080106@ges.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] procfs.c: TARGET_CAN_USE_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINT via target vector References: <1020812213802.ZM1237@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 > +#ifndef TARGET_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS I just think the macro should be `largely' renamed: ``PROCFS_HAS_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINTS''. Largely? There are a few exceptions -- i386v-nat.c and mips/tm-embed.h which could be left alone. enjoy, Andrew