From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26459 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2002 02:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26447 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2002 02:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2002 02:39:32 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E53CF7; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D547CE2.6070403@ges.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020802 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Mips, return_value_location, small structs References: <3D5438A9.5F0FA8A8@redhat.com> <3D545AB2.4030803@ges.redhat.com> <3D545BC7.B41142D4@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > >> > Re-submitted as a separate patch. >> > >> > The problem: small structs returned in one (or two) registers >> > are aligned left in N32/N64 and aligned right in the others >> > (or vice versa, depending on how you cross your eyes). > >> >> I _think_ you also need to add o32. Can you check that out? Just post >> the results, not the patch. > > > I know o32 needs work too, but the two can be treated separately. > I do guarantee that this patch does not make o32 any worse. > In fact, I have been testing to make sure that none of my patches > have made o32 any worse. > > Can I check this one in for n32, if I promise to work on o32 next? Why not just fix this bug for all three ABIs? o32 is just like n32/n64 in that it cross-eyes the arguments. Andrew