Re: [rfa] hardware breakpoints -- remote targets

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>]

> I made the sugested changes, and removed the set and show functions
> from this patch.
> 
> ok?
> 
> grace
> 
> 2002-08-09  Grace Sainsbury  <graces@redhat.com>
> 
>         * remote.c: (remote_wait, remote_async_wait): Add check for awatch
>         T-packets; the 'a' is not taken as a register number.
> 	(remote_check_watch_resources, remote_stopped_by_watchpoint)
>         (remote_stopped_data_address): New functions; add to target
>         vector.
>         (remote_insert_hw_breakpoint, remote_remove_hw_breakpoint): Change
>         prototypes to match other implementations of this
>         function. replace integer argument with pointer -- the length
>         field in the Z-packet is the length of what is pointed to or 1 if
>         pointer is null. Add to target vector.
>         (remote_insert_watchpoint, remote_remove_watchpoint): Add to
>         target vector.
> 

Yes.  Thanks!

I suspect the set/show stuff is going to need a bit of brainstorming 
(and knowing GDB's luck, a refinement to the remote protocol).

Hmm, now you get to the tricky bit.  Getting a single native 
i386-unknown-linux-gnu gdb to use remote watchpoints when remote but 
native watchpoints when native ... :-)

enjoy,
Andrew