From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Rewrite mips_get_saved_register()
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D53EA0A.2030405@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020809003710.ZM26327@localhost.localdomain>
> This patch depends on the following (as of yet) unapproved patches:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00189.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00195.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00196.html
>
> Okay to commit?
>
> * mips-tdep.c (mips_get_saved_register): Rewrite to use
> frame_register_unwind() instead of find_saved_register().
Sorry, not like this. Can you please, for the moment, just in-line the
call to find_saved_register().
(The two other bugs you fixed were definitly needed and thanks for
finding them. How the code got away with not setting the SP I don't know.)
- if (raw_buffer != NULL)
-
{
-
LONGEST val;
-
if (regnum < 32)
-
/* Only MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE bytes of GP registers are
- saved. */
-
val = read_memory_integer (addr, MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
-
else
-
val = read_memory_integer (addr, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
-
store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum), val);
-
}
In theory (and emphasis on the theory) things need to be changed so that:
- 32 32 bit nameless pseudo-registers are added to the cooked register space
- the 32 64 bit gprs get given a 64 bit virtual type so that they have
identical raw and virtual sizes
- The debug info, for a 32 bit ABI, maps the gpr register numbers onto
the 32 bit pseudo register range
- The gdbarch pseudo register read/write function maps the 32 bit
pseudo-registers onto the 64 bit gprs.
- For init saved regs, dependant on the size of the register saved,
either the the address of the 64 bit GPR or the address of the 32 bit
pseudo-register is set
- a custom mips register unwind function maps the requested register (64
bit gpr or 32 bit pseudo) onto: the 32 bit pseudo, the 64 bit gpr, or a
further recursive unwind call. If it has to do a 32/64 mapping then it
sets not-an-lval.
- you find you have to yank all sorts of register converible code
But like I said, it is theory, the mips suffers from one hack (like the
above) piled on top of another (the register convertable stuff, the
register raw/virtual size being different, ...). I don't know if now is
the time to be experimenting with theories :-)
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-09 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-08 17:37 Kevin Buettner
2002-08-09 9:13 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-08-09 13:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-09 20:26 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D53EA0A.2030405@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox