From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10146 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 15:32:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10131 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 15:32:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 15:32:10 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9FE3CB6; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D513D79.4090205@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 08:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020802 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] 32/64 mistake in mips_find_saved_regs References: <3D4F54EA.6CA82E5E@redhat.com> <3D5030EA.9060102@ges.redhat.com> <3D5055FB.674B2E70@redhat.com> <3D506515.A75820B9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 > Michael Snyder wrote: > >> >> Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > >> > I believe n32 should be setting mips64 to 1. Can you please change that. . > >> >> Really? So you think mips64 specifies 64-bit registers, rather than >> 64 bit addresses? I'll try the change, and see what happens. > > > Well, this caused no regressions, so I'll commit it along with the rest. I didn't expect it to cause regressions :-) There is only one reference to MIPS64 left and that applies to n32 being run in a 64 bit environment. >> > As for the below, yes ok. Can you please also update the comment to >> > read something like: > > > Committed in modified form, as follows: Thanks! Andrew