From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-17346-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12103 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2002 17:04:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12095 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 17:04:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 17:04:23 -0000
Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D5D5D3E98; Mon,  5 Aug 2002 13:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D4EB016.2050607@ges.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 10:04:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020802
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/i386] Consolidate i386 targets
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020805073757.25320A-100000@is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2

> On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> Yes, DJGPP is definitly still supported.  DJGPP is a native 
>> configuration though, and the above list applies to the cross debuggers.
> 
> 
> I think that might confuse someone (it did confuse me): there's only one 
> list of targets in MAINTAINERS, so I thought it pertains to any valid 
> target supported by GDB, whether native or cross.

Something to clarify, yes.  That list is just the target architectures 
-- i386, sh, ia64, et.al.

DJGPP while depending on the i386 architecture is a native so is listed 
under Host/Native.

>  If you remove DJGPP 
> from that list, it might cause someone to think DJGPP is no longer 
> supported.

Sounds like I should re-structure the file.  As an aside, RMS has noted 
that we should be using the correct GNU/Linux tuple name.

Hmm, given there are other redundant targets (rs6000) and targets with 
unfortunate names (s390-linux), I should overhaul the section.  The 
DJGPP change will then make more sense.

> Note that I don't have anything against the change to config.tgt.

I'll split that out.

Andrew