[Fwd: gcore for netbsd]

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 261 bytes --]

Hello,

This patch has made me wonder why gcore even includes <sys/procfs.h>.
Can anyone think of a reason for not simply removing the include?

--

I'm also wondering what the function preempt_derive_stack_segment() is 
for.  I can't find any callers.

Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: gcore for netbsd --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3086 bytes --]

From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gcore for netbsd
Date: 16 Jul 2002 03:35:47 +0200
Message-ID: <amd6totpxo.fsf@sul.e.kth.se>


Hi

I've added gcore support for netbsd, the core writing support need some
more work (like adding more stuff to the elf notes in the netbsd core file)

One simple thing you can do for me is to protect the <sys/procfs.h> in
gcore.c like its done in other files so its possible to include gcore.c on
platforms that doesn't have <sys/procfs.h>.

Love

Index: gcore.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gcore.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -u -w -r1.5 gcore.c
--- gcore.c	12 Apr 2002 23:09:48 -0000	1.5
+++ gcore.c	16 Jul 2002 01:30:03 -0000
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@
 #include "inferior.h"
 #include "gdbcore.h"
 #include "elf-bfd.h"
+#ifdef HAVE_SYS_PROCFS_H
 #include <sys/procfs.h>
+#endif
 #include "symfile.h"
 #include "objfiles.h"