From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20055 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 21:49:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20047 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 21:49:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 21:49:14 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (totem.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.242]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA2B8049; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:49:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D49ACDA.988F972B@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 14:49:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] One pass/fail per expect list References: <3D0A4801.8030001@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Hello, > > The attached tweaks gdb_expect_list{} so that it only prints one pass / > fail / ... message for the testcase. > > What are peoples thoughts on this change and if positive, is the patch ok? > That is great! I like it. It does not inflate the number of failures and makes it easier for the error log interpreters and databases as they won't see repeated tests. Thank you! -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9