From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23176 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 21:04:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23167 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 21:04:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 21:04:56 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6640A3C63; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:04:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D49A279.9080104@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 14:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grace Sainsbury Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] hardware breakoints in target vector References: <20020730161611.A9278@tomago.toronto.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 + return ((LONGEST)byte_count <= REGISTER_SIZE); BTW, I think the conversion of the macro to a function made the cast redundant. > This is the first patch for inserting hardware breakpoints into the > target vector. let me know if it's all right. > > grace > > 2002-07-30 Grace Sainsbury > > * target.h: Add to_insert_hw_breakpoint, to_remove_hw_breakpoint, > to_insert_watchpoint, to_remove_watchpoint, > to_stopped_by_watchpoint, to_stopped_data_address, > to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint, to_can_use_hw_breakpoint to > target vecctor. Define their corresponding macros so they call > them. > > * target.c: Add default and debug versions of for > to_insert_hw_breakpoint, to_remove_hw_breakpoint, > to_insert_watchpoint, to_remove_watchpoint, > to_stopped_by_watchpoint, to_stopped_data_address, > to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint, to_can_use_hw_breakpoint. > Yes, ok. As Eli has noted, I guess updating the doco is one of those other patches. I see you've picked up gdb/161, ya! Andrew