From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7717 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 18:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7706 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 18:52:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 18:52:09 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F063C63; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:52:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D498359.5000508@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips n64 support, part 1 References: <1020731182328.ZM22007@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 > I've just committed the patch below. > > I considering asking for approval on this patch, but decided that the > addition of the constant and string were obvious. The > mips_gdbarch_init() changes probably aren't obvious, but I think > they're safe in the sense that they won't break support for other MIPS > ABIs. (I have some other patches on the way that I will ask approval > for though.) If you are ever unsure, you should probably ask 8-/ Andrew