From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips_push_arguments: N32/N64 struct arguments
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D4872AE.17B52A07@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1020731232727.ZM24328@localhost.localdomain>
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> The patch below addresses some details in how N32 and N64 struct and
> union arguments are passed. When using the SGI compiler, I'm seeing
> the following failures fixed with this patch:
>
> FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: print sum_array_print(10, *list1, *list2, *list3, *list4)
> FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: print print_long_arg_list, pattern 12
>
> For N32, this patch depends upon my previous patch:
>
> [RFA] mips-tdep.c: Set mips_default_saved_regsize to 8 for N32
>
> Okay to commit?
Kevin,
I had already arrived at these same changes myself, but then
I seemed to have found that the REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR patch which
I just submitted rendered them unnecessary.
Could you try that patch, and meanwhile tell me which fails
these patches helped fix for you?
Michael
>
> * mips-tdep.c (mips_push_arguments): For N32 and N64 ABIs, don't
> write odd sized struct arguments living in registers to the stack.
> For small struct and union arguments not living in registers,
> don't shift the struct when writing to the stack.
>
> Index: mips-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.85
> diff -u -p -r1.85 mips-tdep.c
> --- mips-tdep.c 31 Jul 2002 20:26:49 -0000 1.85
> +++ mips-tdep.c 31 Jul 2002 23:07:27 -0000
> @@ -2536,7 +2536,9 @@ mips_push_arguments (int nargs,
>
> /* Write this portion of the argument to the stack. */
> if (argreg > MIPS_LAST_ARG_REGNUM
> - || odd_sized_struct
> + || (odd_sized_struct
> + && tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N32
> + && tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N64)
> || fp_register_arg_p (typecode, arg_type))
> {
> /* Should shorter than int integer values be
> @@ -2552,8 +2554,10 @@ mips_push_arguments (int nargs,
> typecode == TYPE_CODE_FLT) && len <= 4)
> longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> else if ((typecode == TYPE_CODE_STRUCT ||
> - typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION) &&
> - TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE)
> + typecode == TYPE_CODE_UNION)
> + && TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) < MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE
> + && tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N32
> + && tdep->mips_abi != MIPS_ABI_N64)
> longword_offset = MIPS_STACK_ARGSIZE - len;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-31 16:32 Kevin Buettner
2002-07-31 18:11 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D4872AE.17B52A07@redhat.com \
--to=msnyder@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox