From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32006 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2002 01:49:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31998 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2002 01:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2002 01:49:41 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA1F3D36; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D3F5935.6070207@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators References: <20020723183956.GA28558@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 The changes to ui-file.h and ui-file.c are approved. That at least reduces the patch a bit :-/ I'm pretty sure the tee mechanism will trip up when combined with the page mechanism. That, however, I think is a very separate problem --- the page / mechanism needs a major overhaul. Andrew