From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12010 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2002 21:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12001 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 21:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 21:53:55 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBC93C92; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D3F21F3.3020506@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Adding new files, for new port to Interix (Services For Unix) References: <20020724090730.GB1166@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2 Just FYI, I've sent an e-mail to RMS. It appears that there was an Interix VS UWIN debate on the GCC mailing list and I don't see a definitive statement attributed to RMS that resolves the issues raised. Sigh. Andrew