From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2765 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2002 15:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2754 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2002 15:28:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2002 15:28:47 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9373C41; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:28:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D343BAE.1080300@ges.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:19:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020708 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Obsolete i[3456]86-*-os9k target References: <3D31B0BB.4030809@ges.redhat.com> <20020714173533.GA30061@nevyn.them.org> <15666.7366.759366.807608@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 01:11:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > (this includes os9kread.c but didn't zap any of the os9k stuff in things > > > like stabs read :-( That got too messy. > > > > > > This patch makes the os9k platform (i[3456]86-*-os9k) platform obsolete. > > > Failing objections, I'll commit it in a few days. > > > > > > enjoy, > > > Andrew > > > > Thank you, thank you thank you thank you. One crufty reader down the > > drain. > > > > Don't forget to flush... :-) Done. Hmm, looks like ... > I'll take a look at the remaining bits. ... a brush is needed. I started changing: if (os8k_stabs) else into: /* OBSOLETE if (os8k_stabs) */ /* OBSOLETE */ /* OBSOLETE else */ but gave up. Some of those if() clauses got pretty weired. Not sure what the reader maintainers want to do. enjoy, Andrew