From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 714 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2002 19:40:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 706 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 19:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tetsuo.nj.caldera.com) (63.124.204.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 19:40:06 -0000 Received: from caldera.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tetsuo.nj.caldera.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BJqO404937; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3D2DE1F8.B5D0AA6F@caldera.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:44:00 -0000 From: Petr Sorfa Organization: Caldera X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy CC: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] DWARF support for .debug_loc offsets References: <3D2DB435.AC2C6DA0@caldera.com> <3D2DD90F.95EEC777@caldera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 Hi, > (Well, it's hardly a debacle; more like a minor bureaucratic point. > But it's a useful convention, so I try to spread the news when the > need arises.) Heh. > The only thing that'll be left is the code that checks the form, and > complains if it's not DW_FORM_block, right? Yes, that'll be fine. Yes. Petr