From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3555 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 14:25:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3547 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 14:25:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 14:25:15 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E06A3CC5; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D2AF247.4030001@ges.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020613 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller , Michal Ludvig Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting References: <200207082046.g68KkQo00587@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4.2.0.58.20020709103601.02467b28@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 > At 10:26 09/07/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit: >>OK, I commited this also to gdb_2_2-branch > > > > Whoops, I meant gdb_5_2-branch of course. :-) Pierre, can you also add something to the branch NEWS file mentioning this change? Michal, same for the x86-64 stuff you pulled in? To speak from experience, the first question GDB gets hit with, when making a X.X.1 release, is ``what changed'' and why isn't it mentioned in the NEWS file + announcement file. (Hmm, I'll re-sync the trunk and branch NEWS files since I've got them out of sync). enjoy, Andrew