Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think we ever worried about that. We have broken
> compatibility even between gcc and gdb, sometimes. And here the chance
> is smaller, given that sim and gdb come from the same repo and are
> built and linked together.

All right, I have appended a patch that uses separate numbers for the sh-dsp
registers.  I've left the other numbers unchanged.

regression tested on i686-px-linux-gnu X sh-elf; the tally before and
after the patch is the same:
# of expected passes            6681
# of unexpected failures        322
# of expected failures          60
# of unresolved testcases       29
# of unsupported tests          7
 
> Oh, yes, I see them. I guess they don't reply with 'accepted' in the
> cgen world.

Actually, he did reply, but it was a personal email.

> But I cannot approve changes to the sh64 sim.

So is the sh64 gdb currently without a maintainer?
	
-- 
--------------------------
SuperH
2430 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4AQ
T:+44 1454 462330