From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Tru64 stack unwinding fix
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0FC7A0.10601@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020614120726.G17001@gnat.com>
> I'm sorry the test case involves Ada, but that is the only way
> I found to reproduce it at the time when I looked at this problem.
I suspect a non-ada aware GDB and a breakpoint on
*__hstTransferRegistersPC would do the trick :-)
> Here is the ChangeLog:
> 2002-06-14 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
> * alpha-tdep.c (heuristic_proc_desc): Compute the size of the
> current frame using only the first stack size adjustment. All
> subsequent size adjustments are not considered to be part of
> the "static" part of the current frame.
> Compute the address of the saved registers relative to the
> Frame Pointer ($fp) instead of the Stack Pointer if $fp is
> in use in this frame.
>
> Ok to commit?
Yes (you're in a better position then most to test it). The change to
handle FP and alloca() is very important and something often missed.
> + /* At this point, we know which of the Stack Pointer of the Frame
Pointer
.. or the ..
enjoy,
Andrew
PS: Some things unrelated to your patch I noticed:
> ! vfp = read_next_frame_reg (next_frame, ALPHA_GCC_FP_REGNUM);
I think someone should re-implement read_next_frame_reg() using:
/* Unwind the stack frame so that the value of REGNUM, in the previous
frame is returned. If VALUEP is NULL, don't fetch/compute the
value. Instead just return the location of the value. */
extern void frame_register_unwind (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
int *optimizedp, enum lval_type *lvalp,
CORE_ADDR *addrp, int *realnump,
void *valuep);
as this will work with CFI and generic dummy frames.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-18 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-14 12:12 Joel Brobecker
2002-06-14 12:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2002-06-18 16:52 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-06-18 18:20 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D0FC7A0.10601@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox