From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 335 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2002 21:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32479 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA22884; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D0FA4E9.E317FAF6@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:40:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Missing breakpoint-modify events References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 Keith Seitz wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > I've also inserted a little clean up into ignore_command which will only > > > print the newline when from_tty is set. This cleans up the MI output when > > > -break-after is used. > > > > Hmmm... have you checked whether this affects output from scripts? > > I'm thinking -- > > %> gdb -x myscript >& mylog > > Yes, it will make a small difference, I believe. Before this patch, > set_ignore_count will not print anything, but ignore_command will print a > newline. > > After this patch, neither ignore_command nor set_ignore_count will print > anything. (Which is seems to be the correct behavior.) > > I've run this through the testsuite (linux native), and there are no > regressions. > > I'll wait to hear from you again if this is okay before committing. Sounds like you've covered your bases.