From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19923 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2002 21:48:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19911 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2002 21:48:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2002 21:48:37 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519F83CA3; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:48:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D07C1B6.3080906@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:arm] rewrite arm_push_arguments() as a single two pass loop References: <200206121311.OAA17242@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 > Thoughts, on the general approach? >> > >> > It also adds the command ``set debug arm'' which will cause the code to print out the arguments as they are pushed. >> > >> > Ok for arm? >> > Andrew > >> >> Hmm, with patch ... >> > > > Looks ok to me (at least, I can't spot any problems by inspection). Thanks, when I tried it it also appeared to work. Andrew