From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15401 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2002 21:52:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15386 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 21:52:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 21:52:04 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EB23E16; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:52:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CFE8812.30003@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 14:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Groessler Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Delete sim/z8k/list.c References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 > If no one sees problems, I'll commit it in a few days. The files >> generated by writecode appear to be identical with/without the change >> (but only if the before case has a freshly re-generated list.c, er, hmm >> .... :-). > > > What do you mean by that? The old list.c was definately wrong (since > z8k-opc.h was changed). Yes. I was doing a comparison of the generated files using the old / new writecode programs. Unfortunatly, on my first attempt, I didn't think to regenerate list.c and (since it was wrong) I ended up with all sorts of worrying differences. Luckily you'd brought the need to re-generate list.c to my attention and, once that was done, the differences went away. > I tried your patch, and it works for me. Please commit. Will do. enjoy, Andrew