From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16698 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2002 14:58:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16690 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2002 14:58:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2002 14:58:35 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E193B3E79; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 10:58:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CFA32A2.6030607@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 07:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Groessler Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] z8k fixes References: <87adrcq6v7.fsf@panther.aladdin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > 2002-05-07 Christian Groessler > > * z8k-tdep.c (z8k_print_register_hook): Fix display of 32 and > 64 bit register contents for little endian hosts. > I've checked this part in. The list.c part: > 2002-05-07 Christian Groessler > > * list.c: Regenerated with current opcodes/z8k-opc.h. > has got me curious. Is there a reason to even generate the file list.c (instead of just keeping it internal?). As an aside, are there a pre-packaged z8k toolchain and a set of GDB test results available? Andrew