From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20536 invoked by alias); 24 May 2002 21:40:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20507 invoked from network); 24 May 2002 21:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.31.105.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2002 21:40:06 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF12E3CBF; Fri, 24 May 2002 17:40:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CEEB33B.6070001@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 15:00:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020518 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB interpreters References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00905.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 21 May 2002, Keith Seitz wrote: > > >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > >> > Can we have completion on known interpreter names in these commands? The >> > default completer function completes on symbols from the inferior, which >> > is really not a good idea in this case ;-) > >> >> I can certainly look into that... > > > Ok, I admit, I know very little about the completer. However, I can copy > code as well as the next guy! :-) > > How does this look? (This would be a patch for the file I posted > yesterday.) Hmm, I've now twice seen the same problem - a completer for a changing (growing) list of options. (JimI had it with a C++ command he was adding). Can I suggest creating a bug report noteing this limitation in the cli interface. enjoy, Andrew