From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28284 invoked by alias); 20 May 2002 13:29:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28247 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 13:29:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uk.superh.com) (193.128.105.170) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 May 2002 13:29:13 -0000 Received: from sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com (sh-uk-ex01 [192.168.16.17]) by uk.superh.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4KDPHu06683; Mon, 20 May 2002 14:25:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from superh.com ([192.168.17.40]) by sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 20 May 2002 14:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: <3CE8FA6C.2B7B54CC@superh.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 06:29:00 -0000 From: Joern Rennecke Organization: SuperH UK Ltd. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Oliva CC: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, Nick Clifton , hp@bitrange.com, thorpej@wasabisystems.com Subject: Re: print_insn_sh cleanup References: <20020511115603.W3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020513082324.R3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <15584.11203.728429.774659@localhost.redhat.com> <15585.5715.936570.74188@localhost.redhat.com> <15585.10835.680930.43907@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE2B34F.EAAEF3F8@superh.com> <15587.63152.235989.94659@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE4FA74.196833F8@superh.com> <15589.2932.876159.694148@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE51671.4342DA12@superh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2002 13:28:04.0218 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BA84DA0:01C20002] X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00814.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Did you run check in binutils too? It's badly hosed at the moment; > all SH64 tests in a sh64-elf build with --target_board=sh-hms-sim fail > because the disassembler is printing SHmedia instructions as if they > were SHcompact. I get expected passes: 25 and untested testcases: 7. I'm not sure what you mean with --target-board=sh-hms-sim, though. Is that something you used for configuring, or that you supply for testing? My site.exp uses set_target_list { "sh-hms-sim" } . -- -------------------------- SuperH 2430 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4AQ T:+44 1454 462330