From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12060 invoked by alias); 20 May 2002 04:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12035 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 04:35:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 May 2002 04:35:20 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1DF3CA5; Mon, 20 May 2002 00:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CE87D0C.7020704@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:35:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020518 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Revise REGISTER_SIM_REGNO() References: <3CE19430.8030201@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00808.txt.bz2 > +enum { > + /* Normal sane architecture. The corresponding register cache > + entry is zero filled and the register is marked as unavailable. */ > + SIM_REGNO_UNAVAILABLE = -1, Does: SIM_REGNO_DNE = -1, sound better? For the moment remote-sim.c would mark the register as unavailable (fixme comment). At least, though, the name is right. > + /* For possible backward compatibility. The register cache doesn't > + have a corresponding name. Skip the register entirely. */ > + LEGACY_SIM_REGNO_IGNORE = -2 > +}; Andrew