From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16681 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 17:59:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16631 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 17:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 17:59:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA20826; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CE541BF.C833493F@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:59:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason R Thorpe CC: m.m.kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, ac131313@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Don't gdbarch_init for core files References: <20020517135849.ZGDH1268.amsfep15-int.chello.nl@[127.0.0.1]> <20020517104712.A14437@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2 Jason R Thorpe wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:58:49PM +0200, m.m.kettenis@chello.nl wrote: > > > if (!exec_bfd) > > set_gdbarch_from_file (core_bfd); > > > > I tested this, and it seems to solve the problems for me when testing > > my pending i386 multi-arch patches on Linux. > > Hm, why didn't I think of that :-) > > This would be totally cool with me. Let's do it.