From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27058 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 18:16:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27051 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 18:16:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tetsuo.nj.caldera.com) (63.124.204.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 18:16:54 -0000 Received: from caldera.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tetsuo.nj.caldera.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4AIT8c06988; Fri, 10 May 2002 14:29:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3CDC1174.75CC64A1@caldera.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:16:00 -0000 From: Petr Sorfa Organization: Caldera X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" Subject: [RFH] F95 expression parser Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 Hi, Yet another round of questions (and some attempts to answer them on my part), but this time concerning my F95 expression parser patch. 1) Should I submit it first to FSF for approval? I assume so. 2) Should a separate branch be created for the F95 support? Currently I don't think this is necessary. The expression parser doesn't really touch any of the existing files (except for those needed to register a new language and Makefile stuff.) The patch only introduces the F95 expression parser, not proper F95 support (so eval.c will be minimally touched.) True support for F95 is coming in separate patches for more accurate review/approval by relevant owners. Mainly DWARF and eval stuff. Petr