From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9139 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 18:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9132 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 18:02:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 18:02:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA11157; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CDAB695.3FFDB0C@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 11:02:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] arm_scan_prologue: accept strh and strb as well as str References: <200205090919.KAA08500@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > msnyder@redhat.com said: > > Err, sorry, I should have mentioned that there are a few more trivial > > white-space changes in here too. Sloppy of me. Forgot they were > > there. > > Generally, its a good idea to keep unrelated white-space changes in a > separate patch -- that way, should we need to back out the patch for > technical reasons, we don't loose the independent white-space change. I know -- my bad.