From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15855 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 03:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15848 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 03:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 03:11:09 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D773C5D; Wed, 8 May 2002 23:11:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CD9E8D3.5020106@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 20:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , msnyder@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, msnyder@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as (). References: <200205090258.g492wgF17617@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 > Yes, all my dwarf-2 configurations show type="void (*)(void)", and all my > stabs+ configurations show type="void (*)()". This is true for both > gcc v2 and gcc v3 compilers. > > You can see the characteristic patterns in the attention table: > > http://www.shout.net/pub/mec/sunday/2002-05-05/Attention-gdb-HEAD.html [broken link?] > All five dwarf-2 configurations FAIL on these tests, and all five stabs+ > configurations PASS. Ok, good. Yes, definitly ok then. It isn't the job of the MI testsuite to test for STABS vs DWARF2 problems. > There is duplicated code in gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp if someone wants > to hit that too. Don't worry. Andrew