From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28474 invoked by alias); 9 May 2002 00:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28450 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 00:25:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 00:25:24 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A5A3D7D; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:25:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CD9C1F9.3080308@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 17:25:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as (). References: <200205082300.g48N0lW02289@reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com> <3CD9B72D.5040502@cygnus.com> <3CD9B7A7.915805F@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > >> > This changes a couple of patterns that accept function pointer types. >> > It allows them to accept (void) in addition to (). >> > >> > 2002-05-08 Michael Snyder >> > >> > * mi-var-child.exp: Accept (void) as well as (). >> > > >> >> Just to double check. This () vs (void) is from STABS vs DWARF2? > > > I dunno -- I just know it is appearing in my latest-gcc embedded target, > and doesn't appear in my older native-linux gcc. > > Is it imporatant? Neither is really incorrect... It shouldn't be. Just want to be sure that the difference isn't something MI can control. Anyone know? enjoy, Andrew