From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14077 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 23:54:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14070 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 23:54:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2002 23:54:33 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA10098; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CD9B7A7.915805F@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:54:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as (). References: <200205082300.g48N0lW02289@reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com> <3CD9B72D.5040502@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > This changes a couple of patterns that accept function pointer types. > > It allows them to accept (void) in addition to (). > > > > 2002-05-08 Michael Snyder > > > > * mi-var-child.exp: Accept (void) as well as (). > > > > Just to double check. This () vs (void) is from STABS vs DWARF2? I dunno -- I just know it is appearing in my latest-gcc embedded target, and doesn't appear in my older native-linux gcc. Is it imporatant? Neither is really incorrect...