Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> 
> > [sorry for the empty reply]
> > OK -- I'd be glad to do that.  Could you possibly
> > provide me an example to work from?
> 
> Below.
> 
> >
> > arm_scan_prologue is easy, since it accepts prologue instructions
> > in any order, but arm_skip_prologue imposes an ordering on them.
> > I would REALLY like to merge these two functions.  In fact I started
> > to, but then got busy with other things.
> 
> Go for it...

OK, how do you like the attached?

Also, Andrew and I have been discussing whether the saved arg regs
should actually be added to the frame-saved-regs.  If we decide that
they should, may I have your pre-approval to make that change?

Thanks,
Michael