From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15326 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 14:55:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15278 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 14:55:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tetsuo.nj.caldera.com) (63.124.204.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 14:55:33 -0000 Received: from caldera.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tetsuo.nj.caldera.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47F7Kc03212; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD7EDA7.111E6F4B@caldera.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 07:55:00 -0000 From: Petr Sorfa Organization: Caldera X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" Subject: [RFA] Generalizing compiler invocation for FORTRAN95 testsuite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 Hi, I'm going to be releasing the FORTRAN95 testsuite soon. Unfortunately since there is currently no functional g95 the testsuite relies on invoking Intel's FORTRAN95 compilers (efc (IA64) and ifc (IA32).) I'm just wondering how I should generalize this dependency and still invoke the correct compilers? Would it also be a good idea to create a gdb.fortran95 directory under gdb/testsuite/? Petr