From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZE toregister_size
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 17:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CD71D30.7000506@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CD71654.7904493A@redhat.com>
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> For most architectures. The relationship:
>>
>> REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE(N)
>> == REGISTER_RAW_SIZE(N)
>> == TYPE_LENGTH(REGISTER_VIRTUAL_TYPE(N)
>>
>> (the exception is the @$(*&@(^$*&^!@ MIPS ...).
>
>
> Surely this is also true for x87 regs?
Nope! The i386 register is 80 bits. When pushed on the stack, extra
space is reserved to make it 4 byte aligned (96 bit) but the extra two
bytes at the end don't get used.
>> Given this, the
>> attached patch changes the architecture vector so that it defaults both
>> to the register's type size.
>>
>> I think this is the logical conclusion to MichaelS's earlier patch that
>> provided defaults to each.
>>
>> Thoughts? I'll look to commit it in a week.
>
>
> If I understand it, it won't affect any target that explicitly
> sets these methods -- in which case I agree with the change.
Yes, it isn't ment to affect existing targets. Up until now you were
required to set the methods as otherwize GDB wouldn't build/run.
thanks for the comments,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-07 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-05 19:28 [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZE to register_size Andrew Cagney
2002-05-05 22:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-05-06 13:38 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-05-06 17:01 ` [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZE toregister_size Michael Snyder
2002-05-06 17:17 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-05-07 3:21 ` [patch/rfc] default REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE and REGISTER_RAW_SIZE to register_size Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-07 8:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-07 9:04 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-07 10:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-08 6:55 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-08 6:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-08 7:01 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-11 19:03 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CD71D30.7000506@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox