From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30630 invoked by alias); 4 May 2002 01:44:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30428 invoked from network); 4 May 2002 01:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2002 01:44:57 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA21242; Fri, 3 May 2002 18:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CD33A17.A8657A1F@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 18:44:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Check for corruption of cv_type chain References: <20020503215423.B21045EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020503221418.GA29293@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > If you're testing the Dwarf 2 support, you have to ignore all sorts of > failures; why is this one any different? NNNNNOOOOOOOOooooooooooo!!! We're supposed to be trying to _reduce_ the number of "ignore" failures. Can't we xfail this on targets that don't support stabs or something? BTW, Jim, that would include all 64-bit targets...